3

Having fallen onto your hands and knees on asphalt, the top layer of skin is gone from your wrists, and you can see tiny amounts of blood that are not coming out of anywhere in particular (perhaps the pores in my estimation). The blood is also not collecting. You aren't "bleeding" per se, as it's not continuously running. But there is blood there.

The injury is round in shape, skin missing. Around the edges, the top layer has peeled back. I hesitate to call it a cut or a bruise, although there is swelling. When this happened to me, it didn't scab over. It just kind of went away after a few days. I suppose it would be some kind of impact related thing, but I'm not sure, hence me asking.

I guess the thing it's closest to is a road rash, where it's very red and there is blood visible, but there's no blood coming out. The scab is where its healed, not the injury itself. What's the term for this kind of skin damage?

3
  • 1
    I don't think your question can be answered with any degree of certainty from this description. A photo would help.
    – Carey Gregory
    Oct 1 '17 at 16:40
  • It's called an abrasion. And I was looking for photos but none are minor enough to fit it. They're all serious damage with yellowing. But regardless of severity, it's called an abrasion. Oct 1 '17 at 17:21
  • 1
    From your description it could also have been an avulsion.
    – Carey Gregory
    Oct 2 '17 at 14:12
1

I think you are discussing about ABRASION...it's what called the injury caused by rubbing over rough surfaces with your skin peeled off..search images for abrasion to confirm it.Also look for CONTUSION.Most probably it must be abrasion from your words. REFERENCE: Essentials of Forensic Medicine. Author-Narayan Reddy

1
  • 1
    Welcome Siddharthan. We value proper formatting and elaborate answers on Health.SE and StackExchange in general, and I would welcome you to edit your answer and update it. Furthermore, you are encouraged to take the tour. The root of your answer is correct, as the OP verified in comments below the question.
    – Narusan
    Oct 1 '17 at 19:23
1

As the OP has verified in the comments, the injury is in fact called an abrasion.

Quick Overview

Abrasion is a wound caused by rubbing or scraping the skin or a mucous membrane; a “skinned knee” and a “floor burn” are common examples. To treat the injury, the wound should be washed, a mild antiseptic or antibiotic ointment applied, and the wound covered with sterile gauze.
Source: Medical-Dictionary.The-Free-Dictionary.com

Basically, the following happens when one injures oneself causing an abrasion:

  • The top layer of the skin (Epidermis) gets torn off by the friction, revealing the dermis and its minor blood vessels below. This is why the wound is hardly bleeding.
  • Nerv ends in the dermis are also revealed, this is why the comparably small injury causes a lot of pain.
  • The open wound secrets exudate, mainly consisting of blood serum.

The layers of the skin: Image Credit: Wikipedia

Image Credit: Wikipedia.org

Treatment

Usually, abrasions do not lead to infections. Nevertheless, it can't hurt to be cautious.

Because the wound doesn't bleed a lot, dirt does not get washed away naturally that easily and it is recommended to rinse the wound first. In Germany, it is not recommended to rinse the wound with water (albeit the water having very good quality, it is not sterile) and instead, it is sufficient to mechanically clean the wound with sterile compressions.

This has the advantage over disinfectants that the blood clotting is not inhibited. Opinion on this differs in the U.S., where normal cleaning is still recommended.

However, it hardly matters for a minor injury like this. If you do not have a sterile compression at hand, I recommend to use water instead.

Afterwards, the open wound should be covered with a liquid bandage or a sterile bandage.

Visit a doctor if signs of a severe infection should appear or if the abrasion covers a large area. The wound will then require special treatment.

2
  • 1
    I am aware that this answer is a bit short on references. This is the case for two reasons: a) I have done my best to research and couldn't really find anything citable (PubMed obviously has no meaningful studies on this) and b) it's a very basic topic even taught in first aid courses, so I think that I can get away with my low amount of references.
    – Narusan
    Oct 1 '17 at 20:10
  • Yes this is an example of when fewer references are needed, it's a basic definition type of question and the answer's done well.
    – DoctorWhom
    Oct 4 '17 at 3:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.