I have read a couple of research articles that seem to be quite laudative toward autologous tenocyte implantation (ATI):

  • (1) presents a successful recovery for partial-thickness rotator cuff tear and tendinopathy in an elite athlete using ATI.
  • (2) lists a few upsides / positive findings:

    The efficacy of tendon cell use for tendon repair has been verified in a number of in vitro and animal studies, (33-35). Animal studies have revealed that implantation of in vitro-expanded autologous tenocytes improved the tendon structure and facilitated the healing process in both an acute tendon tear model, (33) and a chronic degenerative tendon disease model, (35).

    Clinical applications of Ortho-ATI injections have demonstrated reduced pain and inflammation, restoration of fibre structure, reduction in vascular hyperplasia, and improved cellular morphology. This indicates that injection of in vitro-expanded autologous tenocytes alters the progression of tendinopathy. (35)"

  • (3) also only contains positive results, though I have only be able to access the abstract so far (despite my university library paying millions of USD every year for journal subscriptions, and asking a colleague of mine working in one of the largest French medical university):

    The mean final follow-up time for the remaining 15 patients was 4.51 years (range, 3.08-5.17 years). No complications were observed at the patellar tendon biopsy site for any patient. No adverse events, infection, or excessive fibroblastic reactions were observed in any patient at the injection site. Clinical evaluation revealed significant (P < .001) improvement in mean VAS pain score from 5.73 at initial assessment to 1.21 (78% improvement) at final follow-up. Mean QuickDASH, UEFS, and grip strength scores also significantly (P < .001) improved from initial assessment to final follow-up (from 45.88 to 6.61 [84%], from 31.73 to 9.20 [64%], and from 19.85 to 46.60 [208%], respectively). There was no difference in mean QuickDASH and UEFS scores at 1 year and final follow-up (P > .05); however, grip strength continued to improve (P < .001). A validated MRI scoring system indicated that the mean grade of tendinopathy at the common extensor origin improved significantly (P < .001) from initial assessment (4.31) to 1 year (2.88) and was maintained (P > .05) at final follow-up (2.87). At final follow-up, 93% of patients were either highly satisfied or satisfied with their ATI treatment.

What are the downsides / risks of autologous tenocyte implantations, if any, aside from:


I am mostly interested in the lateral epicondyle of the humerus.

(1), (2), and (3) all have conflicts of interest (at least one author works for a firm that aims to make profits from autologous tenocyte implantations).


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.