3

Last year, the US FDA issued an "Emergency Use Authorization" for Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for Covid-19.

I read the wikipedia page on what that means, and it seems as though this can be issued under very lax conditions (e.g. human use after animal-only experiments). On the other hand, I know that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine passed "Phase III" trials.

What is missing, therefore, for the vaccine to qualify for "regular" FDA approval? Is it a longer period of time for evaluating the possibility of unexpected mid/long-term detrimental effects in vaccinated patients? Are there additional missing experiments/trials? Or perhaps just administrative procedures?

PS - I've gotten (both doses of) this vaccine already, so please don't mistake this question to about whether or not to get vaccinated.

1
  • Basically the threshold of evidence required for approval by the FDA for emergency use is lower than what they would otherwise require for such an approval. This authorization is contingent and does not represent standard "approval". Section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act details the procedures and requirements the FDA must use to grant EUA. – Brandon Bourgeois Mar 24 at 1:51
0

Well, it turns out I was wrong: The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine's Phase 3 trials have not been completed: US Government listing of the trials. They will not be over before 2023...

The FDA approval requirements/process is summarized as follows:

  1. An Investigational New Drug application
  2. Pre-licensure vaccine clinical trials
  3. A Biologics License Application (BLA)
  4. Inspection of the manufacturing facility
  5. Presentation of findings to FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC)
  6. Usability testing of product labeling

So, it seems the vaccine is in step 2 of the above. Although it theoretically may have already cleared steps (3.), (4.) and (6.) independently. Perhaps others can shed light on this point.

2
  • In your opening paragraph, did you mean "2003"? I'm guessing that's a typo. – RockPaperLz- Mask it or Casket Mar 25 at 7:55
  • @RockPaperLz-MaskitorCasket: Yes, you're right, I meant 2023. I was rather surprised to learn this was the case. – einpoklum Mar 25 at 9:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.