Preciser phrasing of the question: Do I need to consume the daily recommended dose of water-soluble vitamins every single day? Or is it sufficient if my consumption averages to the daily dose over a longer timeframe (and what timeframe would that be)?

I am aware that:

  • fat-soluble vitamins can be stored for a long time (months, possibly even years in some cases).
  • water-soluble vitamins can (with the exception of B12) only be stored for a short time.

However, I have not found any clear answer to how short the "short time" for water-soluble vitamins is (a single day? A week? Not at all?). Answers I found are usually vague or inconsistent with each other (and also not sourced):

"it is recommended that you replenish your stores of water-soluble vitamins every few days" [1]

"you should try to get them regularly from your diet." [2]

"water-soluble vitamins dissolve in water and are not stored by the body. Since they are eliminated in urine, we require a continuous daily supply in our diet." [3]

Background: I am currently trying to eat healthier than I used to. One thing I want to track is my vitamin intake to ensure that I do not develop deficiencies.

However, I am not sure how granularly I have to keep up with daily recommended doses.

Example: The German Nutrition Society recommends 110mg of Vitamin C daily for me [4]. Does this mean that I actualy need 110mg every single day in order to not develop a deficiency long-term? Or is it sufficient if I track my intake, e.g., on a weekly basis (requiring 770mg per week)?

I am aware that there are also differing opinions about the actual amount per day that is needed (e.g., 110mg in Germany, 90mg in the US [5]) but this is out-of-scope of my question.


1 Answer 1


You do not need to get 100% of Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) of every water-soluble vitamin every single day. It depends on the vitamin, but you can safely assume it is enough you get about 7 RDAs of each in a week.

It is often said that water-soluble vitamins (B complex and C) are not stored in the body, but this is not exactly true. There is always a "pool" of vitamins in the liver or somewhere else from which they are available for few weeks at least.

There is no known vitamin deficiency that would develop in a healthy well-nourished adult within a week of abstinence from that vitamin.

Time in which symptoms can develop after stopping or greatly reducing vitamin intake:

  • Vitamin B1 (thiamin): within 12 weeks (WHO)
  • Vitamin B2 (riboflavin): several months (Britannica)
  • Vitamin B3 (niacin): in 4 months (WHO)
  • Vitamin B9 (folate): within a month ; vitamin B12 (cobalamin): in 3-5 years (Emedicine)
  • Vitamin C: within 1-2 months (NIH-ODS, WHO)

It requires weeks to months of undernutrition for deficiencies of water-soluble vitamins (except vitamin B12) to develop, whereas deficiencies of fat-soluble vitamins, and of vitamin B12, require more than a year to develop due to larger body stores (US Pharmacist).

  • Difference between regulatory bodies/countries indicate that the numbers are largely arbitrary. Unless a real deficiency develops much lower doses are quite fine. Take VitC. USA: 90mg (was lower before) Germany 110mg (was lower before). Mean daily intake in Netherlands only 78mg, yet zero cases of scurvy… Jun 21, 2019 at 16:13
  • I'm thinking all the time that RDAs are probably much greater than "minimal" and even "optimal" amounts. They pumped the RDA for potassium to 4.7 g/day, which is just unrealistic for many people.
    – Jan
    Jun 21, 2019 at 16:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.