"Instant oatmeal" is a popular product; it typically is fully cooked in 1-3 minutes.

A friend was telling me that it's not nearly as healthy as cooking regular oatmeal (which typically takes at least 30 minutes to cook), because instant oatmeal is somehow "processed".

Ignoring any sugar that is added to instant oatmeal for flavor, is there any health benefit to regular oatmeal as compared to instant oatmeal?


Whole oats are generally processed into three different product categories, listed here from least refined to most refined. All oat products have the inedible husk and chaff removed.

  • Steel-cut oats are minimally processed. The tough bran is still intact, and the oats have not been heated or pressed. Cooking time is typically 15-30 minutes.
  • Rolled oats often have the tough bran removed which makes them easier to cook and eat, but does remove some of the nutritional quality. They are pressed into a flat shape which increases the surface area, allowing them to absorb water faster and thus cook faster. They are pressed with a large roller, hence the name rolled oats.
  • Instant oats (or quick oats) are mostly the same as rolled oats, but they are often precooked and pressed even flatter for faster cooking.

According to the USDA Nutrient Database, both steel-cut and rolled oats have identical nutrient contents from a chemical perspective. I have heard that steel-cut oats should have more fibre and trace minerals due to inclusion of the bran, but I had trouble finding source for this and it may vary across different product lines.

From a human digestion perspective, steel cut oats will have the lowest glycemic index because their smaller surface area means digestion happens more slowly. Steel cut oats may be preferable for people who are trying to improve regulation of their blood sugar level.

But really, the healthiest oatmeal is the oatmeal you actually eat. If instant oats makes it much easier for you to eat oats regularly, and if switching to steel-cut oats means you would eat oats less often, then you're better off sticking with what works for you.

  • I'd think a smaller size would mean more rapid digestion, not slower. That, and mastication would, it seems to me, mean the size of the oats would be moot, other than it taking longer to chew the larger oats. – BillDOe Apr 16 '18 at 19:21
  • @BillDOe I edited my answer to clarify surface area, not volume. Digestion is a process of chemical reactions and reactions proceed faster when more surface area is available. (Think of how it's possible to burn steel wool but not a steel block.) – Nic Apr 16 '18 at 19:25
  • @Nic, I think we're on the same page then. – BillDOe Apr 17 '18 at 23:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.