I recall reading, perhaps 25 years ago, one of those counter-intuitive factoids noting that milk had more calories than soda, ounce for ounce (but of course that this was offset by nutritional benefits of milk). I believe this was referring to skim milk, widely quoted (and presumably stable over time) at 90 calories per 8 ounces, or 135 calories per 12 ounces. And I think I remember noticing that it made sense because a 12-ounce can of (regular sweetened) soda was typically labeled as less than this -- the number I picture seeing is 120 calories.

But in recent times I see 12-ounce cans of soda labeled as at least 140 and sometimes 150+ calories, reversing the comparison that I thought used to be made. I am unable to find mention of lower calorie contents in the past or evidence of the factoid I recall (skim milk > soda). I know it is a bit ill-defined because of variation between brands/types of soda.

So: was a typical 12-ounce regular soda (Coke, Pepsi, etc.) 140-150 calories even 25 years ago? Has it increased (which I can imagine might happen gradually over time due to a stealth "sweetness war")? Or is my recollection off (perhaps the original comparison was to whole milk and so I'm thinking of the wrong numbers)?

  • When you remember product info from 25 years ago, the portion size was probably 8oz. They would list a 12 oz can as 1.5 servings.
    – Debbie M.
    Commented Aug 14, 2017 at 16:13
  • @DebbieM. You have to go much farther back than 25 years to find 8-oz being the standard bottle size. I recall 12-oz bottles first showing up in the late '60s/early '70s.
    – Carey Gregory
    Commented Aug 14, 2017 at 19:45
  • I didn't mean can/bottle size. I was referring to the serving size printed on the nutrition label. You didn't read my second sentence did you? ;)
    – Debbie M.
    Commented Aug 14, 2017 at 23:47

1 Answer 1


I am satisfied that the calorie content of soda has been fairly constant over the past few decades. A 1992 newspaper article says "a 12-ounce can of 7-Up, Sprite or Coca-Cola contains 150 calories". I conclude that comparisons claiming more calories in milk than soda (ounce for ounce) were, and are, applicable to milk containing fat rather than skim milk.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.