Skip to main content
23 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 16, 2016 at 20:05 comment added Dave Liu @kenorb Hi again, you're right that it would make sense to clarify sources of my quotes. Thanks for pointing out how confusing it would be, if someone wanted to check my source.
Feb 16, 2016 at 15:59 comment added kenorb Can you clarify sources of your quotes?
Jun 10, 2015 at 17:58 comment added Dave Liu I've researched pesticides a lot in the past few years and have done a few comparison studies of my own. :) (Fun fact: vinegar can be used for cleaning as well as killing/repelling common house crickets)
Jun 10, 2015 at 17:54 comment added Dave Liu @jiggunjer Almost all producers use some form of pesticide. Produce that doesn't use pesticide is susceptible to massive crop-destruction. Although groups like this: sustainabletable.org/263/pesticides attempt to use less pesticides, they still resort to pesticides when all else fails because it's most the most time/money efficient solution. (Eg: Mechanical traps = $$$ in setup/maintenance and can't be used everywhere.) Stanford researchers have a reputation that I doubt they would want to risk by using non-conventional comparisons (that is, organic foods that don't use Ps).
Jun 10, 2015 at 17:44 comment added Dave Liu @jiggunjer organic components tend to decompose more easily due to the nature of their components. You could even consider vinegar or cocoa to be organic pesticides. Synthetic pesticides are things that aren't found in nature, so then if they can't be found in nature, that tends to indicate they cannot be processed by nature, or are hard to, because bacteria, fungi and etc. aren't used to breaking it down.
May 22, 2015 at 19:31 comment added jiggunjer Regarding 2 claims about pesticides(Ps) in this answer. First, why do you say organic Ps decompose better than synthetic ones? This seems like a hasty generalization. Second, the stanford paper mentions there is less Ps on/in food, but this is an average that might be pulled down by organic food that completely omits Ps. The measurement in the organic case should only include products that use Ps, IMO.
Apr 27, 2015 at 21:42 history edited michaelpri CC BY-SA 3.0
Reformatted links
Apr 22, 2015 at 23:36 history edited Dave Liu CC BY-SA 3.0
Clarified one of the links.
Apr 22, 2015 at 23:34 comment added Dave Liu Yeah, sorry it's not clear, I have it as "annals.org/article.aspx?articleid=1355685", but I'll clarify that.
Apr 22, 2015 at 0:00 history bounty ended Nate Barbettini
Apr 22, 2015 at 0:00 vote accept Nate Barbettini
Apr 21, 2015 at 23:59 comment added Nate Barbettini You referred to a Stanford paper, can you cite it as well?
Apr 21, 2015 at 23:58 history edited Nate Barbettini CC BY-SA 3.0
moved tl;dr to top
Apr 21, 2015 at 23:26 history edited Dave Liu CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 2 characters in body
Apr 21, 2015 at 23:19 history edited Dave Liu CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 2 characters in body
Apr 21, 2015 at 22:47 history edited Dave Liu CC BY-SA 3.0
added 105 characters in body
Apr 21, 2015 at 22:41 history edited Dave Liu CC BY-SA 3.0
added 3703 characters in body
Apr 21, 2015 at 22:29 history edited Dave Liu CC BY-SA 3.0
added 3703 characters in body
Apr 21, 2015 at 21:02 history edited Dave Liu CC BY-SA 3.0
added 157 characters in body
Apr 21, 2015 at 20:54 history edited Dave Liu CC BY-SA 3.0
Added more sources and expanded answer.
Apr 21, 2015 at 20:18 comment added Nate Barbettini Not sure why this has 4 downvotes. I already upvoted, but would you consider expanding your answer some?
Apr 7, 2015 at 20:49 history edited michaelpri CC BY-SA 3.0
edited links
Apr 6, 2015 at 23:36 history answered Dave Liu CC BY-SA 3.0