Timeline for Pacemaker and MRI
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2019 at 1:54 | vote | accept | rnso | ||
| Mar 24, 2019 at 1:54 | |||||
| Sep 30, 2015 at 15:49 | history | edited | watkipet | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Yikes! More typos.
|
| Sep 29, 2015 at 19:14 | review | Late answers | |||
| Sep 30, 2015 at 2:47 | |||||
| Sep 28, 2015 at 23:37 | history | edited | watkipet | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Typos
|
| Sep 28, 2015 at 18:02 | comment | added | Atl LED | Good job! That's a great skill to pick up and use pretty much anywhere you are linking something about science. | |
| Sep 28, 2015 at 17:35 | history | edited | watkipet | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added that I work for one of the companies mentioned in the paper.
|
| Sep 28, 2015 at 17:30 | comment | added | watkipet | @Atl LED, Thanks! I think I finally understand how to make the DOI link. | |
| Sep 28, 2015 at 17:29 | history | edited | watkipet | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Finally understood how to make a DOI link. It looks better now.
|
| Sep 28, 2015 at 17:22 | history | edited | watkipet | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Quoted article to list. Reworded some things that no longer made sense with the quote.
|
| Sep 28, 2015 at 17:17 | comment | added | Atl LED | Check the pubmed and do you notice the doi part of your edit (doi: 10.1111/pace.12061) you can in fact make a DOI link out of that. The change in access may have something to do with what ISP you're using, are you perhaps sometimes looking at the link from an institution or university? | |
| Sep 28, 2015 at 16:24 | history | edited | watkipet | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Can't link to article--added a messed up citation. Hopefully people can find the article.
|
| Sep 28, 2015 at 15:45 | comment | added | watkipet | I'm not sure if I can make a DOI link for that source. It appears that if I access the link from Google first, I can access it later. After some time, however, clicking on the link just brings me to Medscape's login page. I've downloaded a PDF of the article from another source (Wiley Periodicals), but I'm not sure if I'm allowed to distribute it. The title of the article is Evaluating MRI-Compatible Pacemakers: Patient Data Now Paves the Way to Widespread Clinical Application?. I'm going to look around for other papers I can link to. | |
| Sep 25, 2015 at 18:36 | comment | added | Atl LED | First, welcome and you are correct. Will you make DOI links preferably, or at least public links, and also include a reference for your two bullet points? For our site it's particularly important to be well referenced. | |
| Sep 24, 2015 at 15:14 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 25, 2015 at 18:36 | |||||
| Sep 24, 2015 at 15:12 | history | answered | watkipet | CC BY-SA 3.0 |