Timeline for Are dosages of Saccharin Sodium in food are non-carcinogenic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2020 at 16:07 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jan 17, 2020 at 16:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Dec 18, 2019 at 15:18 | answer | added | Chris Rogers | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 14, 2019 at 20:19 | comment | added | R S | @Gordon thanks. Whatever brand/form - doesn't matter, I used liquid actually, like EZ-Sweetz. | |
| Dec 14, 2019 at 20:09 | comment | added | R S | @Carey Gregory I made clarification. | |
| Dec 14, 2019 at 20:08 | history | edited | R S | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Dec 14, 2019 at 19:59 | history | edited | R S | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 106 characters in body
|
| Dec 14, 2019 at 18:26 | comment | added | Carey Gregory♦ | The answer is "yes" because there are non-carcinogenic doses of virtually everything. Your question would be improved by clarifying what you mean. | |
| Dec 14, 2019 at 16:58 | comment | added | Gordon | Israeli study mentioned here: scientificamerican.com/article/… | |
| Dec 14, 2019 at 16:49 | comment | added | Gordon | You can do some research on cyclamates too. Supposedly legal in Canada, Mexico and Australia and other places too I guess. The USA may have banned this one too quickly. I think they fed the rats with like “tons” of it and they got cancer. | |
| Dec 14, 2019 at 16:45 | comment | added | Gordon | Are you talking about the stuff in the pink packs? There is some research out of Israel that shows it could produce bad gut bacteria or something like that. You can search for the details of that study. I don’t think cancer was the concern but rather that it might actually contribute to Type 2 diabetes. The pink packs I think. But find the study for proper details. | |
| Dec 14, 2019 at 10:17 | comment | added | Chris Rogers | I agree with @Jan and I am especially surprised to see "It may also cause anorexia." in there. The question also needing to be asked is what temperatures are required for heating to decomposition. Use in foods might not reach those temperatures | |
| Dec 14, 2019 at 10:12 | comment | added | Jan | Some (mainly older) studies say yes, it's carcinogenic and some (mainly newer) studies say, it's "insufficient evidence" - and such answers may not be convincing for you. I just wanted that you actually find few other studies and check and taste the confusion. You may want to use a date filter (aka after 2010). If you are willing to do this, we can then discuss further. I mean PubChem, full respect, but they on their own are not an absolute reference. | |
| Dec 14, 2019 at 10:09 | comment | added | R S | @Jan thanks. Believes to what exactly? | |
| Dec 14, 2019 at 9:54 | comment | added | Jan | Answering such questions is ungratifying because rarely one believes it...I really suggest you to just check few other sites using the site:gov operator (mostly studies). Here's one: cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/diet/… . Early research said yes, it is associated with bladder cancer, but newer research says "not sure"... | |
| Dec 14, 2019 at 9:50 | comment | added | R S | @Jan just did it. | |
| Dec 14, 2019 at 9:50 | history | edited | R S | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 97 characters in body
|
| Dec 14, 2019 at 9:49 | comment | added | Jan | Would you add the link to the source of the quote? | |
| Dec 14, 2019 at 9:41 | history | asked | R S | CC BY-SA 4.0 |