Timeline for Can one meet 100% of recommended daily intake without consuming too many calories?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2019 at 14:48 | answer | added | Jan | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 14, 2019 at 12:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Sep 20, 2018 at 19:31 | comment | added | paparazzo | @JohnP I lived on 1500 calories active. | |
| Sep 5, 2018 at 21:20 | comment | added | JohnP | I think you are underestimating both the calories you need and the calories you consume. For example, a 30 year old man who is 5'4" and 135 lbs needs 1500 calories just to breathe in and out and do nothing else all day. | |
| Sep 5, 2018 at 21:00 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Aug 13, 2018 at 16:54 | comment | added | Count Iblis | Why not eat kale for lunch :). | |
| Aug 13, 2018 at 9:06 | comment | added | JoeDough | @Count Iblis according to this nutritiondata.self.com/facts/vegetables-and-vegetable-products/… 1 kg of potatoes would provide only 10% of RDI of calcium and over 800 calories.That doesn't seem enough.What's with all the people recommending oranges and brocolli when they are incredibly poor sources of calcium? | |
| Aug 12, 2018 at 17:46 | comment | added | Count Iblis | Eat 500 grams of vegetables and 500 grams of fruits every day. Eat 1 kg of boiled potatoes instead of 500 grams floating in oil. If you leave the oil out, you can eat more potatoes or pasta and you'll want to add more vegetables to such a meal. As a bonus, you'll find that such meals also provide you with a fair share of the RDA of protein, so you need to eat less meat. | |
| Aug 6, 2018 at 17:46 | answer | added | Gordon | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 6, 2018 at 15:14 | comment | added | Jan | ...like this: lpi.oregonstate.edu/mic/articles | |
| Aug 6, 2018 at 15:09 | comment | added | Jan | Naah, it's a single database and if you learn how to narrow down the search, it's really useful. Here's the original database from USDA.gov: in this one you can search by food or by a nutrient or by a combination of nutrients. Or you can find some big nutrition site that lists nutrients and has tables of foods high in them. | |
| Aug 6, 2018 at 15:02 | comment | added | JoeDough | Maybe not misinformation but to be honest most people would think that they are really getting nutrients from something once they read that (and all other "this has x" when it has insignificant amounts of it). @Jan I've found these sites only recently, however finding articles listing foods is much easier than examining a database of thousands of products.Besides, there's a problem I've mentioned, looking for only certain nutrients will leave you without other nutrients. | |
| Aug 6, 2018 at 15:01 | comment | added | Jan | You can use a single source, such as NutritionData, for most foods and judge yourself what's rich. | |
| Aug 6, 2018 at 14:29 | comment | added | Carey Gregory♦ | Why do you think it's misinformation? | |
| Aug 6, 2018 at 13:55 | review | First posts | |||
| Aug 6, 2018 at 22:50 | |||||
| Aug 6, 2018 at 13:54 | history | asked | JoeDough | CC BY-SA 4.0 |